Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting Archives

Planning for the future: 5 business succession options and their tax implications

NEWS|April 17, 2025

When it’s time to consider your business’s future, succession planning can protect your legacy and successfully set up the next generation of leaders or owners. Whether you’re ready to retire, you wish to step back your involvement or you want a solid contingency plan should you unexpectedly be unable to run the business, exploring different succession strategies is key. Here are five options to consider, along with some of the tax implications.

1. Transfer directly to family with a sale or gifts

One of the most common approaches to succession is transferring ownership to a family member (or members). This can be done by gifting interests, selling interests or a combination. Parents often pass the business to children, but family succession plans can also involve siblings or other relatives.

Tax implications:

Gift tax considerations. You may trigger the federal gift tax if you gift the business (or part of it) to a family member or if you sell it to him or her for less than its fair market value. The annual gift tax exclusion (currently $19,000 per recipient) can help mitigate or avoid immediate gift tax in small, incremental transfers. Plus, every individual has a lifetime gift tax exemption. So depending on the value of the business and your use of the exemption, you might not owe gift taxes on the transfer. Keep in mind that when gifting partial interests in a closely held business, discounts for lack of marketability or control may be appropriate and help reduce gift taxes.

Estate planning. If the owner dies before transferring the business, there may be estate tax implications. Proper planning can help minimize estate tax liabilities through trusts or other estate planning tools.

Capital gains tax. If you sell the business to family members, you could owe capital gains tax. (See “5. Sell to an outside buyer” for more information.)

2. Transfer ownership through a trust

Suppose you want to keep long-term control of the business within your family. In that case, you might place ownership interests in a trust (such as a grantor-retained annuity trust or another specialized vehicle).

Tax implications:

Estate and gift tax mitigation. Properly structured trusts can help transfer assets to the next generation with minimized gift and estate tax exposure. Trust-based strategies can be particularly effective for business owners with significant assets.

Complex legal framework. Because trusts involve legal documents and strict rules, working with us and an attorney is crucial to ensure compliance and optimize tax benefits.

3. Engage in an employee or management buyout

Another option is to sell to a group of key employees or current managers. This path often ensures business continuity because the new owners already understand the business and its culture.

Tax implications:

Financing arrangements. In many cases, employees or managers may not have the funds to buy the business outright. Often, the seller finances part of the transaction. While this can provide ongoing income for the departing owner, interest on installment payments has tax consequences for both parties.

Deferred payments. Spreading payments over time can soften your overall tax burden by distributing capital gains across multiple years, which might help you avoid being subject to top tax rates or the net investment income tax. But each payment received is still taxed.

4. Establish an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

An ESOP is a qualified retirement plan created primarily to own your company’s stock, and thus it allows employees to own shares in the business. It may be an appealing choice for owners interested in rewarding and retaining staff. However, administering an ESOP involves complex rules.

Tax implications:

Owner benefits. Selling to an ESOP can offer potential tax deferrals, especially if the company is structured as a C corporation and the transaction meets specific requirements.

Corporate deductions. Contributions to an ESOP are usually tax-deductible, which can reduce the company’s taxable income.

5. Sell to an outside buyer

Sometimes, the best fit is outside the family or current employees or management team. You might decide to sell to an external buyer — for example, a competitor or private equity group. If you can find the right buyer, you may even be able to sell the business at a premium.

If your business is structured as a corporation, you may sell the business’s assets or the stock. Sellers generally prefer stock (or ownership interest) sales because they minimize the tax bill from a sale.

Tax implications:

Capital gains tax. Business owners typically pay capital gains tax on the difference between their original investment in the business (their “basis”) and the sale price. The capital gains rate depends in part on how long you’ve held the business. Usually, if you’ve owned it for more than one year, you’re taxed at the applicable long-term capital gains rate.

Allocation of purchase price. If you sell the assets, you and the buyer must decide how to allocate the purchase price among assets (including equipment and intellectual property). This allocation affects tax liabilities for both parties.

Focus on your unique situation

Succession planning isn’t a one-size-fits-all process. Each option has unique benefits and pitfalls, especially regarding taxes. The best approach for you depends on factors including your retirement timeline, personal financial goals and family or employee involvement. Consult with us to ensure you choose a path that preserves your financial well-being and protects the business. We can advise on tax implications and work with you and your attorney to structure the deal advantageously. After all, a clear succession plan can safeguard the company you worked hard to build.

Exploring business entities: Is an S corporation the right choice?

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|April 3, 2025

Are you starting a business with partners and deciding on the right entity? An S corporation might be the best choice for your new venture.

One benefit of an S corporation

One major advantage of an S corporation over a partnership is that shareholders aren’t personally liable for corporate debts. To ensure this protection, it’s crucial to:

Adequately finance the corporation,
Maintain the corporation as a separate entity, and
Follow state-required formalities (for example, by filing articles of incorporation, adopting bylaws, electing a board of directors and holding organizational meetings).

Handling losses

If you anticipate early losses, an S corporation is more favorable than a C corporation from a tax perspective. Shareholders in a C corporation generally don’t benefit from such losses. However, as an S corporation shareholder, you can deduct your share of losses on your personal tax return, up to your basis in the stock and any loans you made to the entity. Losses exceeding your basis can be carried forward and deducted in the future when there’s sufficient basis.

Profits and taxes

Once the S corporation starts earning profits, the income is taxed directly to you, whether or not it’s distributed. It will be reported on your individual tax return and combined with income from other sources. Your share of the S corporation’s income isn’t subject to self-employment tax, but your wages will be subject to Social Security taxes. If the income qualifies as qualified business income (QBI), you can take the 20% pass-through deduction, subject to various limitations.

Note: The QBI deduction is set to expire after 2025 unless extended by Congress. However, the deduction will likely be extended and maybe even made permanent under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act extension being negotiated in Congress.

Fringe benefits

If you plan to offer fringe benefits like health and life insurance, be aware that the costs for a more than 2% shareholder are deductible by the entity but taxable to the recipient.

Protecting S status

Be cautious about transferring stock to ineligible shareholders (for example, another corporation, a partnership or a nonresident alien), as this could terminate the S election, making the corporation a taxable entity. To avoid this risk, have each shareholder sign an agreement not to make transfers that would jeopardize the S election. Also, be aware that an S corporation can’t have more than 100 shareholders.

Final steps

Before making your final decision on the entity type, consult with us. We can answer your questions and help you launch your new venture successfully.

Maryland’s Proposed Business-to-Business Tax: A Direct Hit on Small Businesses

|March 10, 2025

Maryland lawmakers are considering a 2.5% sales tax on business-to-business (B2B) services, which could significantly impact small businesses across the state. The proposed tax, outlined in House Bill 1554 and Senate Bill 1045, would apply to essential professional services such as accounting, consulting, IT, advertising, and equipment repair—all of which small businesses rely on to stay compliant and competitive.

Why Small Businesses Will Bear the Biggest Burden

Unlike large corporations with in-house teams, small businesses depend on outside professionals for financial management, payroll, and compliance. This new tax would make these services more expensive, forcing small business owners to:

Absorb the costs, cutting into already tight margins.
Raise prices for consumers, making it harder to stay competitive.
Reduce reliance on critical services, increasing financial and legal risks.

This tax discourages small business growth and makes Maryland a less attractive place to do business, especially compared to neighboring states like Virginia and Delaware that don’t impose such a tax.

A Compliance Nightmare for Small Business Owners

Beyond the financial burden, this tax creates complex regulatory challenges. Questions arise, such as:

If a Maryland CPA prepares taxes for a business with locations in multiple states, how is the tax applied?
If a consultant works remotely, splitting time between multiple locations, where does the tax apply?
Will small businesses have to track and report professional service taxes on top of existing compliance burdens?

This tax could result in confusion, disputes, and increased administrative costs, making it even harder for small businesses to operate smoothly.

A Hidden Tax on Consumers

The proposal could lead to tax pyramiding, where taxes accumulate at different stages of production, ultimately driving up the cost of goods and services for consumers.

Other States Have Tried and Failed

Maryland isn’t the first state to consider taxing professional services—but history shows it doesn’t work.

Florida (1987) repealed its service tax within six months due to overwhelming business opposition.
Michigan (2007) repealed a similar tax within one day after immediate backlash.

Maryland’s Competitiveness is at Risk

With today’s remote work capabilities, businesses can easily hire professionals in other states. If Maryland imposes this tax, it risks losing revenue, jobs, and business growth.

What Small Business Owners Can Do

If this tax concerns you, now is the time to take action:

Call or email your legislators—explain how this tax would impact your business.
Join business organizations advocating against the tax.
Stay informed—follow updates and attend hearings.

Maryland’s small businesses are the backbone of the economy. Let’s make sure policymakers understand the real impact before it’s too late. Read more about these proposed bills here.

How Section 1231 gains and losses affect business asset sales

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|February 6, 2025

When selling business assets, understanding the tax implications is crucial. One area to focus on is Section 1231 of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs the treatment of gains and losses from the sale or exchange of certain business property.

Business gain and loss tax basics

The federal income tax character of gains and losses from selling business assets can fall into three categories:

Capital gains and losses. These result from selling capital assets which are generally defined as property other than 1) inventory and property primarily held for sale to customers, 2) business receivables, 3) real and depreciable business property including rental real estate, and 4) certain intangible assets such as copyrights, musical works and art works created by the taxpayer. Operating businesses typically don’t own capital assets, but they might from time to time.
Sec. 1231 gains and losses. These result from selling Sec. 1231 assets which generally include 1) business real property (including land) that’s held for more than one year, 2) other depreciable business property that’s held for more than one year, 3) intangible assets that are amortizable and held for more than one year, and 4) certain livestock, timber, coal, domestic iron ore and unharvested crops.
Ordinary gains and losses. These result from selling all assets other than capital assets and Sec. 1231 assets. Other assets include 1) inventory, 2) receivables, and 3) real and depreciable business assets that would be Sec. 1231 assets if held for over one year. Ordinary gains can also result from various recapture provisions, the most common of which is depreciation recapture.

Favorable tax treatment

Gains and losses from selling Sec. 1231 assets receive favorable federal income tax treatment.

Net Sec. 1231 gains. If a taxpayer’s Sec. 1231 gains for the year exceed the Sec. 1231 losses for that year, all the gains and losses are treated as long-term capital gains and losses — assuming the nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss rule explained later doesn’t apply.

An individual taxpayer’s net Sec. 1231 gain — including gains passed through from a partnership, LLC, or S corporation — qualifies for the lower long-term capital gain tax rates.

Net Sec. 1231 losses. If a taxpayer’s Sec. 1231 losses for the year exceed the Sec. 1231 gains for that year, all the gains and losses are treated as ordinary gains and losses. That means the net Sec. 1231 loss for the year is fully deductible as an ordinary loss, which is the optimal tax outcome.

Unfavorable nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss rule

Now for a warning: Taxpayers must watch out for the nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss rule. This provision is intended to prevent taxpayers from manipulating the timing of Sec. 1231 gains and losses in order to receive favorable ordinary loss treatment for a net Sec. 1231 loss, followed by receiving favorable long-term capital gain treatment for a net Sec. 1231 gain recognized in a later year.

The nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss for the current tax year equals the total net Sec. 1231 losses that were deducted in the preceding five tax years, reduced by any amounts that have already been recaptured. A nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss is recaptured by treating an equal amount of current-year net Sec. 1231 gain as higher-taxed ordinary gain rather than lower-taxed long-term capital gain.

For losses passed through to an individual taxpayer from a partnership, LLC, or S corporation, the nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss rule is enforced at the owner level rather than at the entity level.

Tax-smart timing considerations

Because the unfavorable nonrecaptured Sec. 1231 loss rule cannot affect years before the year when a net Sec. 1231 gain is recognized, the tax-smart strategy is to try to recognize net Sec. 1231 gains in years before the years when net Sec. 1231 losses are recognized.

Conclusion

Achieving the best tax treatment for Sec. 1231 gains and losses can be a challenge. We can help you plan the timing of gains and losses for optimal tax results.

Employers: In 2025, the Social Security wage base is going up

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|December 24, 2024

As we approach 2025, changes are coming to the Social Security wage base. The Social Security Administration recently announced that the wage base for computing Social Security tax will increase to $176,100 for 2025 (up from $168,600 for 2024). Wages and self-employment income above this amount aren’t subject to Social Security tax.

If your business has employees, you may need to budget for additional payroll costs, especially if you have many high earners.

Social Security basics

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) imposes two taxes on employers, employees and self-employed workers. One is for Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance, which is commonly known as the Social Security tax, and the other is for Hospital Insurance, which is commonly known as the Medicare tax.

A maximum amount of compensation is subject to the Social Security tax, but there’s no maximum for Medicare tax. For 2025, the FICA tax rate for employers will be 7.65% — 6.2% for Social Security and 1.45% for Medicare (the same as in 2024).

Updates for 2025

For 2025, an employee will pay:

6.2% Social Security tax on the first $176,100 of wages (6.2% × $176,100 makes the maximum tax $10,918.20), plus
1.45% Medicare tax on the first $200,000 of wages ($250,000 for joint returns, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separate returns), plus
2.35% Medicare tax (regular 1.45% Medicare tax plus 0.9% additional Medicare tax) on all wages in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 for joint returns, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separate returns).

For 2025, the self-employment tax imposed on self-employed people will be:

12.4% Social Security tax on the first $176,100 of self-employment income, for a maximum tax of $21,836.40 (12.4% × $176,100), plus
2.90% Medicare tax on the first $200,000 of self-employment income ($250,000 of combined self-employment income on a joint return, $125,000 on a return of a married individual filing separately), plus
3.8% (2.90% regular Medicare tax plus 0.9% additional Medicare tax) on all self-employment income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 of combined self-employment income on a joint return, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separate returns).

History of the wage base

When the government introduced the Social Security payroll tax in 1937, the wage base was $3,000. It remained that amount through 1950. As the U.S. economy grew and wages began to rise, the wage base needed to be adjusted to ensure that the Social Security system continued to collect sufficient revenue. By 1980, it had risen to $25,900. Twenty years later it had increased to $76,200 and by 2020, it was $137,700. Inflation and wage growth were key factors in these adjustments.

Employees with more than one employer

You may have questions about employees who work for your business and have second jobs. Those employees would have taxes withheld from two different employers. Can the employees ask you to stop withholding Social Security tax once they reach the wage base threshold? The answer is no. Each employer must withhold Social Security taxes from an employee’s wages, even if the combined withholding exceeds the maximum amount that can be imposed for the year. Fortunately, the employees will get a credit on their tax returns for any excess withheld.

Looking ahead

Do you have questions about payroll tax filing or payments now or in 2025? Contact us. We’ll help ensure you stay in compliance.

Business alert: BOI reporting requirements have been suspended for now

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|December 12, 2024

New beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements that many small businesses were required to comply with by January 1, 2025, have been suspended nationwide under a new court ruling. However, businesses can still voluntarily submit BOI reports, according to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

How we got here

Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), the BOI reporting requirements went into effect on January 1, 2024. The requirements are intended to help prevent criminals from using businesses for illicit activities, such as money laundering and fraud. The CTA requires many small businesses to provide information about their “beneficial owners” (the individuals who ultimately own or control the businesses) to FinCEN. Failure to submit a BOI report by the applicable deadline may result in civil or criminal penalties or both.

Under the CTA, the exact deadline for BOI compliance depends on the entity’s date of formation. Reporting companies created or registered before January 1, 2024, have one year to comply by filing initial reports, which means their deadline would be January 1, 2025. Those created or registered on or after January 1, 2024, but before January 1, 2025, have 90 days to file their initial reports upon receipt of their creation or registration documents. Entities created or registered on or after January 1, 2025, would have 30 days upon receipt of their creation or registration documents to file initial reports.

New court ruling

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order granting a nationwide preliminary injunction that:

Enjoins the CTA, including enforcement of the statute and regulations implementing its BOI reporting requirements, and,
Stays all deadlines to comply with the CTA’s reporting requirements.

The U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the Treasury Department, filed an appeal in the case on December 5, 2024.

FinCEN states on its website that it “continues to believe … that the CTA is constitutional,” but while the litigation is ongoing, it will comply with the order as long as it remains in effect.

“Therefore,” it adds, “reporting companies are not currently required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and will not be subject to liability if they fail to do so while the preliminary injunction remains in effect.”

This is the latest litigation related to the CTA. In two earlier cases, U.S. District Courts upheld the BOI reporting requirements. In another case, the CTA was ruled unconstitutional, but only the named plaintiffs and their members were allowed to ignore the BOI requirements while an appeal is pending. More than 30 million other businesses still needed to meet the January 1, 2025, deadline — until now.

The future is unclear

Be aware that the ruling is preliminary, so it could be overturned or modified by future court decisions or legislation. FinCEN stated that businesses can continue to submit BOI reports voluntarily. Contact us if you have questions about how to proceed.

Reasons an LLC might be the ideal choice for your small to medium-size business

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|December 3, 2024

Choosing the right business entity is a key decision for any business. The entity you pick can affect your tax bill, your personal liability and other issues. For many businesses, a limited liability company (LLC) is an attractive choice. It can be structured to resemble a corporation for owner liability purposes and a partnership for federal tax purposes. This duality may provide the owners with several benefits.

Like the shareholders of a corporation, the owners of an LLC (called members rather than shareholders or partners) generally aren’t liable for business debts except to the extent of their investment. Therefore, an owner can operate a business with the security of knowing that personal assets (such as a home or individual investment account) are protected from the entity’s creditors. This protection is far greater than that afforded by partnerships. In a partnership, the general partners are personally liable for the debts of the business. Even limited partners, if they actively participate in managing the business, can have personal liability.

Electing classification

LLC owners can elect, under the “check-the-box rules,” to have the entity treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. This can provide crucial benefits to the owners. For example, partnership earnings aren’t subject to an entity-level tax. Instead, they “flow through” to the owners in proportion to the owners’ respective interests in the profits and are reported on the owners’ individual returns and taxed only once. To the extent the income passed through to you is qualified business income (QBI), you’ll be eligible to take the QBI deduction, subject to various limitations.

In addition, since you’re actively managing the business, you can deduct on your individual tax return your ratable shares of any losses the business generates. This, in effect, allows you to shelter other income that you (and your spouse, if you’re married) may have.

An LLC that’s taxable as a partnership can provide special allocations of tax benefits to specific partners. This can be an important reason for using an LLC over an S corporation (a form of business that provides tax treatment that’s similar to a partnership). Another reason for using an LLC over an S corporation is that LLCs aren’t subject to the restrictions the federal tax code imposes on S corporations regarding the number of owners and the types of ownership interests that may be issued. (For example, an S corp can’t have more than 100 shareholders and can only have one class of stock.)

Evaluate the options

To sum up, an LLC can give you protection from creditors while providing the benefits of taxation as a partnership. Be aware that the LLC structure is allowed by state statute, and states may use different regulations. Contact us to discuss in more detail how use of an LLC or another option might benefit you and the other owners.

Understanding your obligations: Does your business need to report employee health coverage?

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|October 29, 2024

Employee health coverage is a significant part of many companies’ benefits packages. However, the administrative responsibilities that accompany offering health insurance can be complex. One crucial aspect is understanding the reporting requirements of federal agencies such as the IRS. Does your business have to comply, and if so, what must you do? Here are some answers to questions you may have.

What is the number of employees before compliance is required?

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, introduced several employer responsibilities regarding health coverage. Certain employers with 50 or more full-time employees (called “applicable large employers” or ALEs) must use Forms 1094-C and 1095-C to report information about health coverage offers and enrollment for their employees.

Specifically, an ALE uses Form 1094-C to report each employee’s summary information and transmit Forms 1095-C to the IRS. A separate Form 1095-C is used to report information about each employee. In addition, Forms 1094-C and 1095-C are used to determine whether an employer owes payments under the employer shared responsibility provisions (sometimes referred to as the “employer mandate”).

Under the ACA mandate, an employer can be penalized if it doesn’t offer affordable minimum essential coverage that provides minimum value to substantially all full-time employees and their dependents. Form 1095-C is also used in determining employees’ eligibility for premium tax credits.

If an employer has fewer than 50 full-time employees, including full-time equivalent employees, on average during the prior year, the employer isn’t an ALE for the current year. That means the employer isn’t subject to the employer shared responsibility provisions or the information reporting requirements for the current year.

What information must be reported?

On Form 1095-C, ALEs must report the following for each employee who was a full-time employee for any month of the calendar year:

The employee’s name, Social Security number (SSN) and address,
The Employer Identification Number (EIN),
An employer contact person’s name and phone number,
A description of the offer of coverage (using a code provided in the instructions) and the months of coverage,
Each full-time employee’s share of the coverage cost under the lowest-cost, minimum-value plan offered by the employer, by calendar month, and
The applicable safe harbor (using one of the codes provided in the instructions) under the employer shared responsibility or employer mandate penalty.

What if we have a self-insured plan or a multi-employer plan?

If an ALE offers health coverage through a self-insured plan, the ALE must report additional information on Form 1095-C. For this purpose, a self-insured plan also includes one offering some enrollment options as insured arrangements and other options as self-insured.

Suppose an employer provides health coverage in another manner, such as through a multiemployer health plan. In that case, the insurance issuer or the plan sponsor making the coverage available will provide the information about health coverage to enrolled employees. An employer that provides employer-sponsored, self-insured health coverage but isn’t subject to the employer mandate isn’t required to file Forms 1094-C and 1095-C. Instead, the employer reports on Forms 1094-B and 1095-B for employees who enrolled in the employer-sponsored, self-insured health coverage.

On Form 1094-C, an employer can also indicate whether any eligibility certifications for relief from the employer mandate apply.

Be aware that these reporting requirements may be more complex if your business is a member of an aggregated ALE group or if the coverage is provided through a multiemployer plan.

What are the W-2 reporting requirements?

Employers also report certain information about health coverage on employees’ Forms W-2. But it’s not the same information as what’s reported on 1095-C. The information on either form doesn’t cause excludable employer-provided coverage to become taxable to employees. It’s for informational purposes only.

The above is a simplified explanation of the reporting requirements. Contact us with questions or for assistance in complying with the requirements.

Federal court rejects FTC’s noncompete agreement ban

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|September 5, 2024

In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved a final rule prohibiting most noncompete agreements with employees. The ban was scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024, but ran into multiple court challenges. Now the court in one of those cases has knocked down the rule, leaving its future uncertain.

The FTC ban

The FTC’s rule would have prohibited noncompetes nationwide. In addition, existing noncompetes for most workers would no longer be enforceable after it became effective. The rule was expected to affect 30 million workers.

The rule includes an exception for existing noncompete agreements with “senior executives,” defined as workers earning more than $151,164 annually who are in policy-making positions. Policy-making positions include:

A company’s president,
A chief executive officer or equivalent,
Any other officer who has policy-making authority, and
Any other natural person who has policy-making authority similar to an officer with such authority.

Employers couldn’t enter new noncompetes with senior executives under the new rule.

Unlike an earlier proposed rule issued for public comment in January 2023, the final rule didn’t require employers to legally modify existing noncompetes by formally rescinding them. Instead, they were required only to provide notice to workers bound by an existing agreement — other than senior executives — that they wouldn’t enforce such agreements against the workers.

Legal challenges

On the day the FTC announced the new rule, a Texas tax services firm filed a lawsuit challenging the rule in the Northern District of Texas (Ryan, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission). The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and similar industry groups joined the suit in support of the plaintiff. Additional lawsuits were filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (ATS Tree Services, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission) and the Middle District of Florida (Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission).

The Ryan case is the first to reach judgment. On August 20, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the FTC exceeded its authority in implementing the rule and that the rule was arbitrary and capricious. It further held that the FTC cannot enforce the ban, a ruling that applies on a nationwide basis.

Notably, in July 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction and stay of the rule’s effective date. It found the plaintiff didn’t establish that it was reasonably likely to succeed in its argument against the ban. By contrast, on August 14, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the plaintiff a preliminary injunction and stay. That plaintiff requested relief only for itself, though, not nationwide. But the Ryan ruling means the FTC can’t enforce the ban at all unless it prevails on appeal.

An appeal would be before the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has become a favorite destination for challenges to President Biden’s policies. Although the court often sides with the challengers, it’s also regularly been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

An FTC appeal could face an uphill battle regardless, though, in light of a recent Supreme Court ruling that reversed the longstanding doctrine of “Chevron deference.” Under that precedent, courts gave deference to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws they administer. According to the new ruling, however, it’s now up to courts to decide “whether the law means what the agency says.”

The bottom line

For now, the FTC’s noncompete ban remains in limbo and won’t take effect on September 4, 2024. But that doesn’t mean noncompetes aren’t still vulnerable to attack. For example, some private parties are using anti-trust laws to challenge such agreements. And an FTC spokesperson has indicated that the Ryan ruling won’t deter the agency “from addressing noncompetes through case-by-case enforcement actions.”

If your business has co-owners, you probably need a buy-sell agreement

Management Advisory Services & Business Consulting|August 29, 2024

Are you buying a business that will have one or more co-owners? Or do you already own one fitting that description? If so, consider installing a buy-sell agreement. A well-drafted agreement can do these valuable things:

Transform your business ownership interest into a more liquid asset,
Prevent unwanted ownership changes, and
Avoid hassles with the IRS.

Agreement basics

There are two basic types of buy-sell agreements: Cross-purchase agreements and redemption agreements (sometimes called liquidation agreements).

A cross-purchase agreement is a contract between you and the other co-owners. Under the agreement, a withdrawing co-owner’s ownership interest must be purchased by the remaining co-owners if a triggering event, such as a death or disability, occurs.

A redemption agreement is a contract between the business entity and its co-owners (including you). Under the agreement, a withdrawing co-owner’s ownership interest must be purchased by the entity if a triggering event occurs.

Triggering events

You and the other co-owners specify the triggering events you want to include in your agreement. You’ll certainly want to include obvious events like death, disability and attainment of a stated retirement age. You can also include other events that you deem appropriate, such as divorce.

Valuation and payment terms

Make sure your buy-sell agreement stipulates an acceptable method for valuing the business ownership interests. Common valuation methods include using a fixed per-share price, an appraised fair market value figure, or a formula that sets the selling price as a multiple of earnings or cash flow.

Also ensure the agreement specifies how amounts will be paid out to withdrawing co-owners or their heirs under various triggering events.

Life insurance to fund the agreement

The death of a co-owner is perhaps the most common, and catastrophic, triggering event. You can use life insurance policies to form the financial backbone of your buy-sell agreement.

In the simplest case of a cross-purchase agreement between two co-owners, each co-owner purchases a life insurance policy on the other. If one co-owner dies, the surviving co-owner collects the insurance death benefit proceeds and uses them to buy out the deceased co-owner’s interest from the estate, surviving spouse or other heir(s). The insurance death benefit proceeds are free of any federal income tax, so long as the surviving co-owner is the original purchaser of the policy on the other co-owner.

However, a seemingly simple cross-purchase arrangement between more than two co-owners can get complicated, because each co-owner must buy life insurance policies on all the other co-owners. In this scenario, you may want to use a trust or partnership to buy and maintain one policy on each co-owner. Then, if a co-owner dies, the trust or partnership collects the death benefit proceeds tax-free and distributes the cash to the remaining co-owners. They then use the money to fund their buyout obligations under the cross-purchase agreement.

To fund a redemption buy-sell agreement, the business entity itself buys policies on the lives of all co-owners and then uses the death benefit proceeds buy out deceased co-owners.

Specify in your agreement that any buyout that isn’t funded with insurance death benefit proceeds will be paid out under a multi-year installment payment arrangement. This gives you (and any remaining co-owners) some breathing room to come up with the cash needed to fulfill your buyout obligation.

Create certainty for heirs

If you’re like many business co-owners, the value of your share of the business comprises a big percentage of your estate. Having a buy-sell agreement ensures that your ownership interest can be sold by your heir(s) under terms that you approved when you set it up. Also, the price set by a properly drafted agreement establishes the value of your ownership interest for federal estate tax purposes, thus avoiding possible IRS hassles.

As a co-owner of a valuable business, having a well-drafted buy-sell agreement in place is pretty much a no-brainer. It provides financial protection to you and your heir(s) as well as to your co-owners and their heirs. The agreement also avoids hassles with the IRS over estate taxes.

Buy-sell agreements aren’t DIY projects. Contact us about setting one up.

Planning for the future: 5 business succession options and their tax implications

Exploring business entities: Is an S corporation the right choice?

Maryland’s Proposed Business-to-Business Tax: A Direct Hit on Small Businesses

Why Small Businesses Will Bear the Biggest Burden

A Compliance Nightmare for Small Business Owners

A Hidden Tax on Consumers

Other States Have Tried and Failed

Maryland’s Competitiveness is at Risk

What Small Business Owners Can Do

How Section 1231 gains and losses affect business asset sales

Employers: In 2025, the Social Security wage base is going up

Business alert: BOI reporting requirements have been suspended for now

Reasons an LLC might be the ideal choice for your small to medium-size business

Understanding your obligations: Does your business need to report employee health coverage?

Federal court rejects FTC’s noncompete agreement ban

If your business has co-owners, you probably need a buy-sell agreement

Our Services

Our Industry Expertise

Hunt Valley Office

Bel Air Office

Elkton Office

Latest Tweets